{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
2/21/2014 4:39:12 AM
23
[quote]if my six year old brother is a genius?[/quote]
That is not something that can really be figured out based on this one story. Based solely on it, the answer is no.
English
-
I mean I really wanted the other question answered but whatever.
-
I didn't answer it because it should be obvious. It is simple addition and subtraction done very inefficiently.
-
Obviously but that's still not an answer to my question asshole.
-
It is. What I just said means that it isn't an established formula because it is a solution that is useless and can't really be put into a formula. He unwittingly uses the answer of the question to find the answer to the question, which spawns from not understanding what is going on. He needs to be taught how to effectively and efficiently do basic math or he will have trouble in life. I apologize if I sound mean or condescending, but that is no reason to reciprocate such a perceived attitude.
-
Now you answered my question which was if it's a known thing. You didn't say any of that in the first place.
-
I had answered your question already. The post to which you just replied was a clarification that you rudely implied was necessary.
-
[quote]So someone tell me if this has been an established formula?[/quote] This was the question. You didn't answer it until your third post.
-
That was [i]a[/i] question. If you understood what a formula is in math and the idea of "established" in that context, you would realize that I answered it in my second post. In fact, you would realize that the answer is in your OP.
-
You obviously don't know what I'm asking then because you really didn't. Yes, it's inefficient but you didn't answer me whether it was known inefficient way of doing it.
-
You are quite rude. To start with, I shouldn't have had to answer that, as I have stated. This is mainly due to the fact that his method [i]isn't a formula[/i]. And you didn't ask if it was established as an inefficient formula. Even if you had, for it to be established requires it to have been thought of and dealt with by mathematicians. Simply put, it is a much too ridiculously poor method for doing an extremely basic math problem for anybody to have done so with it. Even of we say established as in truthful, the answer of it being so should be painfully obvious, to the point that an answer shouldn't needed, which would make me wonder if you only said that it was the main question for the sake of having something to say as opposed to it be true. Regardless of the semantics, the answer has been presented to you multiple times from my second post, yourself, and others. Don't make threads if you can't be civil.
-
[quote] And you didn't ask if it was established as an inefficient formula.[/quote] O rly? [quote]So can someone tell me if this has been an established formula [/quote]
-
Edited by Kamots: 2/21/2014 4:14:49 PM[quote][quote] And you didn't ask if it was established as an [b]inefficient[/b] formula.[/quote] O rly? [/quote] Have you given up, or can you not read?
-
It's obviously inefficient. My question is the exact same if has "inefficient" in front of it or not. Try again.
-
[quote]It's obviously inefficient. My question is the exact same if has "inefficient" in front of it or not. [/quote] Saying "established formula" has positive connotations as opposed to being truthful. Regardless, you seem incapable of arguing effectively, as you refuse to respond to any of my actual points.
-
[quote]Saying "established formula" has positive connotations as opposed to being truthful.[/quote] It's still the same question though. [quote]Regardless, you seem incapable of arguing effectively, as you refuse to respond to any of my actual points.[/quote] Because you don't even seem to be capable of understanding the question or the conversation. You also don't seem to have reading comprehension.
-
You are pulling these assumptions about me out of nowhere. It isn't an accurate question when you are asking for something specific. I have answered everything. You have ignored almost everything I have said.
-
You have answered my question yes. But not until the third post. You're making these assumptions more believable.
-
If only your statements had any sort of evidence that hasn't been addressed.
-
If only you had actually answered my questions instead of being a dick about it.
-
You have repeatedly latched onto seemingly random parts of my posts and refused to even consider the rest. Basing your statements on an incomplete knowledge base for what is being talked about dooms you to make faulty statements that make you look foolish or incompetent. If you wish to continue doing so, be my guest. It doesn't really affect me that much, and it doesn't do you any favors.
-
You keep going on and on about something that doesn't anything to do with the initial argument. You keep going off track because you know I'm right. So keep giving me attention if you think you actually answered my questions before the third post you made. I'm enjoying it and your idiocy.
-
I've already responded to everything you can possibly say for your side of argument, so why would I continue?
-
Still doesn't change the fact that you didn't answer my question until the third post. That was the only argument. So keep going. Respond with BS some more.
