{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
12/19/2013 12:00:37 PM
5
You don't know your stuff... No legitimate scientist believes in global warming...
They call it climate change, because all effects are localized. Why do they call it climate change? Because the climate has to change somewhere due to people. It's to save face.
English
-
-
Aha, so you're saying that all the scientists who invest money in climate change being real are saying climate change is real? That must be it. It's not as if their grants rely on it or anything. Seriously, all statistics can be manipulated. Ever heard of Urban Heat? The temperature in a town raises 5 degrees because the cement and metal from the buildings are endothermic. When a scientist builds a station on the outskirts of a town, it's cool, but then the town expands. The heat as a result increases around the station. Then they go out and say that the area is heating up, "probably due to greenhouse gases", when actually, the effects are localized. :)
-
[quote]Aha, so you're saying that all the scientists who invest money in climate change being real are saying climate change is real? That must be it. It's not as if their grants rely on it or anything.[/quote] That's not how the peer review system works. You can't publish things based on self-interest, because you're not the one who gets to make the call on whether or not it gets published.
-
Oh look a Wikipedia chart. Cute.
-
The sources (all peer reviewed, I believe) are listed below the chart.
