{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
5/21/2013 7:53:22 AM
3
People who deny it most likely don't want to accept that they are partly at fault.
English
-
Edited by Camnator: 5/21/2013 9:03:05 AMOr don't want taxes on something that can't be proven and disregard biased scientists that want to keep their jobs by not arguing with their bosses. How do you think it would go down if the government wanted you to prove anthropological global warming and you came back with, "Ehh, no way of knowing but it's most likely natural."
-
>No way of knowing It's actually simple chemistry. With both increased CO2 levels and with CFCs. Especially with CFCs.
-
CO2 does not drive temperature, an increased amount of CO2 does not automatically warm the planet, as I said water vapor (Which has remained unchanged) is a far superior way to measure. CFCs are overhyped and wouldn't effect temperature, just radiation and that was debunked long ago.
