{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
6/22/2025 6:48:21 AM
16
[quote]There's no possible way that out of 40 rolls for the IB scout rifle, only 1 came with heal clip. Weight gate is back. Yay[/quote]
Maybe go figure out how a single perk has only around a 16% chance of ever dropping instead of claiming something that isn't a thing anymore is somehow magically back just because you didn't get what you wanted.
English
-
Or how about you understand that it happened it and can happen again. Especially seeing as Bungie let it slide for MONTH before "fixing" it. Their bugs repeat themselves in new content, since all they do is copy and paste. So new weapons having weight gate on them is 100% possible.
-
[quote] Especially seeing as Bungie let it slide for MONTH before "fixing" it. [/quote] ?
-
Unfortunately we can't have doubts in Bungie because when they admitted it last time they said they were sorry
-
[quote]Unfortunately we can't have doubts in Bungie because when they admitted it last time they said they were sorry[/quote] Yeah, no one said that. A sample size of 40 drops from a single person doesn't prove that a perk problem has returned when much larger sample sizes have been done by significantly more competent people that proves how it isn't a thing and hasn't returned.
-
Edited by amazing_month041: 6/22/2025 4:45:37 PMSo last time you accused me with stalking you yet here you are replying directly to my comment while i was just replying to someone else? Sounds like someone’s confused about who’s really following who Wuff wuff 🐶 🐾🐾
-
[quote]So last time you accused me with stalking you yet here you are replying directly to my comment while i was just replying to someone else? Sounds like someone’s confused about who’s really following who Wuff wuff 🐶 🐾🐾[/quote] My god. The fact that i have repeatedly pointed out how i was referring to the other person who has spent months following me from post to post, you'd think you'd have understood that by now. You also do know that I can't follow you to my own reply that replied under, right? One of these times, you'll figure out that not everything is in reference to you and doesn't revolve around you.
-
Ah yes the classic 'it’s not about you' defense… while replying directly to me🤣 What's next? Accusing me of stalking again for daring to comment under a public post you don’t own? Must be exhausting trying to play victim and gatekeeper at the same time lots of noise no direction 🐾
-
Edited by Salty-47: 6/22/2025 5:46:16 PM[quote]Ah yes the classic 'it’s not about you' defense… while replying directly to me🤣[/quote] I understand you can't read well, but when a statement clearly says and indicates that it's about someone else, that means it 100% isn’t about you. [quote]What's next? Accusing me of stalking again for daring to comment under a public post you don’t own?[/quote] Damn. Yet again, never accused you of anything other than being a typical whiny b*tch. Edit: To help you better understand and maybe attempt to actually read it, I even brought you the direct quote of what I said [quote]Makes sense you'd be on the side of the person who does nothing but stalk me from post to post just to keep crying about me not agreeing with them months ago.[/quote] So please tell me again how me referring to someone else means you? [quote]Must be exhausting trying to play victim and gatekeeper at the same time[/quote] No one is gatekeeping anything, and the only one playing victim is you while thinking everything has to be about you even when stated otherwise. [quote]lots of noise no direction 🐾[/quote] At least you can understand what you're doing.
-
[quote]Or how about you understand that it happened it and can happen again. Especially seeing as Bungie let it slide for MONTH before "fixing" it. Their bugs repeat themselves in new content, since all they do is copy and paste. So new weapons having weight gate on them is 100% possible.[/quote] And your proof of this is what? Or are you just going to ignore the fact that the very same people who actually did all the work to figure it out and which things were affected by it have also proven how it's 100% not a thing? This whole concept of people just whining and claiming it's back just because you didn't get that low drop chance roll first try is just moronic.
-
Just stop. You're just being annoying for no reason when all this -blam!- has already happened and they admitted it.
-
[quote]Just stop. You're just being annoying for no reason when all this -blam!- has already happened and they admitted it.[/quote] Oh no. I pointed out how something that's been fixed and been proven to not be a thing anymore means that you crying about not getting that low drop chance roll of something doesn't mean it's suddenly returned and only seems to be affecting those of you who think that it has to drop first try or it's broken again. Maybe you should quit crying about not getting a roll in a videogame.
-
AGAIN ITS POSSIBLE THAT THEY HAVENT FIXED IT FOR NEWER GEAR BECAUSE ALL THEY DO IS COPY AND PASTE. YOU ARE SUCH A NF ITS CRAZY. GO BACK TO YOUR MOTHERS BASEMENT AND SIT IN YOUR PILES OF GARBAGE. I bet you're the person that has everything given to them all because they ask for it. -blam!- millennial mentality.
-
[quote]AGAIN ITS POSSIBLE THAT THEY HAVENT FIXED IT FOR NEWER GEAR BECAUSE ALL THEY DO IS COPY AND PASTE. YOU ARE SUCH A NF ITS CRAZY. GO BACK TO YOUR MOTHERS BASEMENT AND SIT IN YOUR PILES OF GARBAGE. I bet you're the person that has everything given to them all because they ask for it. -blam!- millennial mentality.[/quote] Says the person crying that they didn't get something immediately. You also seem to keep ignoring the fact that it's been proven by people who get paid to make videos for video games that it isn't a thing anymore. But keep on crying and throwing this tantrum over being told the truth. If you think it magically has returned, then instead of crying about it, how about you do what was done last time and actually prove it. You won't and can't, though. Both because it doesn't exist anymore and because a data pool pulled from just you proves nothing. Now to wait for the next emotional reply.
-
Don_T._Care… busy not giving a f… - old
First off, I am not into your yelling debate with the opener. That’s between the both of you. Second, in our last Exchange regarding statistics you have proven that you are quite unaware of some basics, so why keep coming up with numbers. And this… [quote]You also seem to keep ignoring the fact that it's been proven by people who get paid to make videos for video games that it isn't a thing anymore. [/quote] Hilarious, you could have pulled any „experts“ like the Reddit ppl who were involved, devs, math, whatever. But ppl making videos about video games for money, that’s your statistic expert group?? Clickbaitcreators? No correlation whatsoever. -
[quote]First off, I am not into your yelling debate with the opener. That’s between the both of you. Second, in our last Exchange regarding statistics you have proven that you are quite unaware of some basics, so why keep coming up with numbers.[/quote] You mean the factual numbers that take a matter of seconds to figure out? Yeah, why would I bring those up when someone is yet again crying about not getting a random drop from an extremely small sample size pool? [quote]Hilarious, you could have pulled any „experts“ like the Reddit ppl who were involved, devs, math, whatever. But ppl making videos about video games for money, that’s your statistic expert group?? Clickbaitcreators? No correlation whatsoever.[/quote] Oh no. I used the easiest and quickest way for them to go and find out how it's been fixed by the people who can't spread the information significantly easier than some no-name reddit poster. Go f*cking crying about it. Just because you don't like what was said doesn't make something false.
-
Don_T._Care
… busy not giving a f… - old
That’s not what you said about the video creators. But I don’t want an endless discussion so just the numbers. 1/6 for a roll, correct You ignore the effects of multiple rolls, like last time. Is it possible to roll 40 with 0 success? Yes But highly unlikely. I skip the formula this time. You can just try it. 1/6 is a roll of a die. Grab a handful of dice, roll slots of 40 rolls, write down the number of occurrences for each number. In these slots of 40, to have rolled a number just once, it’s a rare outlier. You will probably see none. Repeat as often as you like. So why does it happen in the game then? Same answer as last time. The chance is not 1/6, how so? Weighting. Not the bugged thing, just the normal weighting.
