Something else I've noticed:
If you type in a certain German extremist political party from the early 1900's, you get [url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin%27s_law]-godwinslaw!-[/url], which is funny if you were on internet forums in the late 1990's and early 2000's.
English
-
not really funny, but more sad that they cannot accept the word. But have to use some sad sack wiki entry to cover it up.
-
No, it's actually still pretty funny.
-
When was the last time you heard about Godwin's law?
-
A few days ago someone, maybe you, I'm not really sure, mentioned godwins law in every single post I saw of theirs for a day or two.
-
The last time that someone was complaining that they couldn't use [i]that word[/i], in the Community Forum...so it wasn't that long ago.
-
It's really sad people still get so butthurt over the word, let alone have to use some craptastic wiki entry to cover it up. It's ok though, they want to censor that word, I'll use something else instead. might not have the same ring to it, but still fits. Schutzstaffel.
-
It's really sad that people still get so butthurt over not being able to use that word, let alone having to make repeated posts about why they can't use it. It's ok though, I think it's funny and people going out of their way to get around it are even funnier.
-
It's not going out of my way when I'm well versed in it. It's in my family history. *shrug*
-
People use the term all the time.
-
Really? Haven't heard it in years.
-
You really need to get out more.
-
Edited by NicVsP: 1/16/2013 2:29:23 AM[url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin%27s_law]-godwinslaw!-[/url] Just testing.
-
Edited by Kickimanjaro: 1/15/2013 8:10:57 PMThat is blatant censorship and meddling in media, you know who did that too? Hitler and the [url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin%27s_law]-godwinslaw!-[/url]. haha I like how it does that now