{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
11/20/2017 1:50:04 AM
6
Rumble is not a good idea with the longish kill times of D2. The game is balanced towards team work in PvP, at least more than it was in D1. I think in order to make Rumble possible, there needs to be reduced cooldowns and kill times across the board.
The same explanation goes for 6v6 I think. I think 6v6 would be far too oppressive with teamfire, even more so than 4v1 is already.
English
-
I disagree, 1v1s end more than quick enough in normal games to be viable in rumble. Still faster TTK than halo which had rumble.
-
Halo had grenades on Respawn and from kills. Idk. I think the TTK in Halo was increased after launch, IIRC.
-
i am thinking of halo 3 specifically. you are probably thinking of 5 which i have never played.
-
2. But it doesn't matter.
-
Yeah true, their choice to focus on teamwork and balance changed PvP a lot compared to Destiny 1. They could've at least had private matches at launch though, it'd definitely keep a decent amount of players on this game.
-
Weren't private matches aimed at competitive play in tournaments, etc? I don't think the majority of people have any reason to do it.
