{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
6/16/2017 8:11:20 AM
10
While most liberals arent violent, liberal ideology is predicated on violence.
Thats why the most violent states in human history have all been left wing socialists like communist china, soviet russia and n@zi germany.
Plenty of liberals are adverse to violence themselves but have no problem with asking or condoning violence on there behalf either by the state or a 3rd party.
You might not but i personally know too many liberals that simply dont care or are worse entused when misfortunate befalls there political opponents.
English
-
How were [url=http://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin%27s_law]-godwinslaw!-[/url] left wing socialists?
-
Well n@zi is short for national socialist and they practiced socialist policy..
-
Discrimination of the highest level does not sound like a socialist policy.
-
Yeah it does. The n@zis and communists loved to discriminate.
-
Just Googled socialism and apparently it means most things are under control of the larger community. Hitler was a dictator so...
-
So were stalin, mao and castro. The "community" is code for the state and who ever controlls it.
-
The n@zi party was originally called the "National [b]Socialist[/b]" party
-
Just because a terrorist calls himself a freedom fighter, doesn't mean he is.
-
Besides their whole kill all jews / untermentsch thing they were indeed rather socialist in some areas
-
So besides their entire agenda?
