{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
3/9/2017 2:04:04 AM
5
I'm looking at the Arminius rolls and I'm torn between 1 and 2. I like the first for Crowd Control and Glass Half Full, giving it more damage, but I like the 2nd roll for Rangefinder.
What I want to know: how good is Rangefinder on auto rifles? Is it worth it?
English
-
For the Arminius-D wait on counterbalance and braced frame
-
Edited by filthee19: 3/9/2017 9:18:19 AMNot sure if you have handed in yet but my advice would be that counterbalance is almost a must have on this gun. A high fire rate auto with low stability is just yuk. Have tried a few different versions of this and the one with higher stability was way better. I would also highly recommend the New Monarchy auto if you can get your hands on it ( especially if you can roll focused fire)
-
Glass half full is a bullshit perk I wouldn't waste my time with that.
-
If you want good effective range on an auto rifle, go with Hakke's Zarinaea or Suros's ARI-41 when they come back: both being Monte Carlo archetype, they're easier to handle with the effective range of shots being two-fold over, if not more effective, than Arminius. For PvE, Roll 1 for sure, can't pass up stacked damage bonuses. I'd also argue that roll 1 appeals to both PvE and Crucible: You may not have counterbalance on top of braced frame, but maybe for you the high-visibility SD Thermal sight and glass half full can make up for some lost stability.
-
Thank you. I don't normally use bullet hoses but it's always good to order one just in case. Glad I did.
