One person deleted 18 minutes of recordings and had to resign as president.
Another person deleted 30,000 confidential emails and is running for president.
Can anyone tell me the major difference between the two?
English
-
Deleting 30, 000 files, or 18 minutes containing just as much damaging data? 18 minutes can destroy a persons life, reveal secrets the public is not mentally mature enough to cope with, expose a delicate operation.
-
I'm not sure what your point is. No one is excusing what Nixon did. Certainly not the way people are for Clinton.
-
I dont support clinton or even live in the US im just comparing to say each are equal crimes.
-
Exactly, that's my point. Equal crimes yet one person continues to run for president and the other had to resign.
-
Clinton wont get into power, the public may be over opinionated know it alls but they are not stupid. Just as a note I dont follow usa politics whos running and why
-
The public is pretty dumb as they voted for the same buffoon twice the last 2 elections.
-
Finally someone who agrees
-
You'd thing that after Congress admitted that Benghazi was a political stunt to try and mudsling Clinton, and that after how long this investigation went for, that there would be results. Sometimes, fabricating results will speed things up, though it could destroy the credibility of the politically party in the future. Just look at the Planned Parenthood mess. Fiorina was one of the frontrunners when that was happening. When it was discovered to be all fabricated lies, Fiorina is now in the bottom and isn't even considered politically significant now.
-
First of all, what Richard Hanna said has already been denounced, but no need looking into any follow ups, right? "There are seven members of the Benghazi Committee who are intimately familiar with the work of the committee, the motives behind the work, and the results of that work. Congressman Hanna is not one of them" - Trey Gowdy Second of all, you understand that the FBI is still conducting a criminal investigation into this, right? It's not even close to being over.
-
Like I said, unless there is nothing to be found, or the FBI is incompetent (which, I highly doubt the FBI is incompetent), there would be results by now, given that it's taken so much time. Hell, if Anonymous can somehow crack ISIS's personal information in less than a day, and they're stuck in their own homes without resources, you'd think that a federal organization with the means to accomplish the same thing can do the same actions, if not faster. At this point, I just see it all as a waste of taxpayer money, money that I have paid, just so people in suits and ties can play with it rather than utilize it for something that is worthwhile, like the maintenance of our already crumbling infrastructure and roads. Or maybe reallocating the budget to put a bit more into mental institutions and medical care, or even adding a bit to education. Nope, they're here making up committees to find things that don't exist, or they fabricate results to make national news.
-
I would agree if the FBI didn't just turn this into a criminal investigation two months ago.
-
From a logical standpoint, if it was any "there" there, the republican investigations, would have found something no?
-
Edited by Flynn: 1/5/2016 10:19:04 PMIf by "Republican investigations" you mean the FBI criminal investigation, it's still ongoing.
-
BTFO T F O
-
[quote]One person deleted 18 minutes of recordings and had to resign as president. Another person deleted 30,000 confidential emails and is running for president. Can anyone tell me the major difference between the two?[/quote]
-
[quote][quote]One person deleted 18 minutes of recordings and had to resign as president. Another person deleted 30,000 confidential emails and is running for president. Can anyone tell me the major difference between the two?[/quote][/quote]