{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
9/24/2015 10:24:14 PM
2
Because the only grammar mistake I could think he is thinking of is capitalise (capitalize in America) but I don't see any grammar mistakes. The other guy is just being petty.
English
-
He's missing a few commas and apostrophes. My knit picking is in mocking reflection of his post. I think I was too subtle with my humour though.
-
You're really making me laugh now. What commas am I missing??? Lol. You should go to bed. I'm sure you need to get up for high school tomorrow.
-
I was referring to OP, actually. But please, jump to more conclusions.
-
I will. Please, make more grammar mistakes. ;)
-
No, he missed commas in his sentence structure, and there is also one too many commas in "cautious, skilled, players."
-
Edited by Miofwin: 9/25/2015 12:13:26 PMThat's an oxford comma. If your job is to proof read university papers and you completed a highest level university course in grammar, you should of recognised that. Now stop getting so triggered by everyone.
-
It is an Oxford comma; I'm saying that you used one too many. It should be "cautious, skilled players." It shouldn't be "cautious, skilled, players." When you put it like that, you're separating your adjectives from the noun you're describing. In this case, the noun is "players." You wouldn't say "Those are some skilled, players." You would take out the comma. When you're listing more than one adjective, you do have to use commas for listing purposes, but the last adjective describing the noun never has a comma after it.
-
Okay. Fair enough.
