{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
10/12/2016 10:50:35 PM
22
Anyone else go back to Halo: Reach
When Microsoft released the patch for it being backwards compatibility. For me, when the patch released, and I played a game of matchmaking, I already knew I was gonna put Halo 5 down and I've only played warzone once or twice due to 11 friends begging me to fill the last spot. But besides that, Reach has been my primary Halo game. I find it more enjoyable, balanced and overall better than Halo 5. I can however give Halo 5 credit where it's due, but besides that, I find Reach to be a better Halo game than Halo 5. So what about you guys? Anyone go back to Reach, still playing 5, or just never put down Reach in the first place.
-
I've played it a few times. I always love getting to gun down mooks with the Falcon gunner turrets. My main gripe is with 343's inconsistency and blase attitude to actually making a good Halo game. Halol 4 was shit across the board in MP, campaign was good. Halol 5 was shit across the board in campaign, but MP was okay-good at times. And the horrendous art style. WHY is everything -blam!-ing plastic and shiny? WHY?! I'll also never understand the hard-on everyone seems to have for the BR. It's nowhere near as good as the Halo 2 version they added in, but it's not seen anywhere outside of customs, Forge, more casual modes, and Warzone. Don't bring up competitive. MLG is cancer.
