{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
9/26/2015 2:47:06 AM
18
-
Lol damn
-
8!, oh wait, they were mum to the condition in which the fish need be, 10! In all honesty, fish can drown, just need a liquid for them to get trapped in that does not allow free passage / diffusion of oxygen throughout it, or complicates the fishes's act of respiration ( water is not the only liquid ) ( respiration also does not solely refer to gas processing lungs, can refer to gills, and cells too ) I am here to mess with peoples minds, no more, no less...
-
-
I instantly said "Wtf? Fish can't drown" then finished reading and laughed Am I smart?
-
Since water is not the only liquid, I would not come to that conclusion that fast without stopping to consider what drowning means (and the words used within) Just saying :P (however, you may call yourself clever or quick)
-
-
-
lol died laughing when I finished reading lel
-
[quote]lol died laughing when I finished reading lel[/quote]
-
Fish can drown: one word, "stroke."
-
Would that not be asphyxiation? (Drowning still possible, but I doubt a stroke alone qualifies for following the definition of drowning a fish)
-
Editado por Ape King Ira: 9/26/2015 7:20:14 PM
-
You have 10, fish can't drown.
-
Not a brain teaser, very stupid
-
Editado por pValue2010: 9/26/2015 7:06:55 PMThey can drown in liquid that isn't water. The answer is 8 alive fish. 2 dead fish.
-
answer is 10, regardless of life, parent post was mum on the state in which these fish need be :P (but it is nice to see someone else that is not a lemming)
-
Eleventytwo
-
Fish can't drown
