{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
2/3/2015 1:06:24 PM
10
Haha bc even scientist realized that it's not global warming but climate change.
English
-
Global warming causes climate change.
-
Edited by elvinjaveth: 2/3/2015 7:16:53 PMSays who? The liberal media? Search it up, over 31,000 scientist deny global warming saying that there's no convincing evidence. Our planet's climate has always changed. There's even many scientists who believe we're heading to another ice age.
-
Where did [i]you[/i] get such a number?
-
Edited by elvinjaveth: 2/4/2015 4:16:33 PMNever heard of the Global Warming Petition? It's a mail in signature petition that was signed by over 31,000 scientists including 9,000 with PhDs, urging the U.S. to reject the global warming agreement adopted in the Kyoto Protocol. The petition states that research data does to show that human use of Hydrocarbons are harmful and that CO2 is in fact environmentally friendly to Flora and Fauna. I'm a Biological Oceanography/Meteorology Major. I plan on doing my own research and not having to rely on others' findings.
-
>implying all those "scientists" have educated opinions on climate change Appeal to authority logical fallacy. You're an idiot.
-
No you are not.
-
31,000 I'm assuming you got that from the conservative media...
-
Edited by elvinjaveth: 2/4/2015 5:05:00 PMNo. I got that from the petition itself. The petition says how many times it's been signed by a certified scientist. Search it up. It's called the Global Warming/Oregon petition.
-
People put names like "Charles darwin" on that petition, and only 9000 claimed to have a PHD.
-
Lol see even Charles Darwin disapproves. Jk but anyways that was when the petition was electronic which is the reason it was converted to mail in only and those names were removed. I'm sure nothing is perfect but the point is that many of those signatures were confirmed scientist. Just bc Wikipedia is only around 3% incorrect doesn't mean that you will disregard every bit of information on there.
