{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
1/14/2015 5:53:58 PM
5
They have no obligation to print it but they're cowards for choosing not to.
English
-
Surely a national (and government funded) broadcaster has an obligation to represent its viewers, and to actively offended a fair portion of them isn't cricket. I'd say it was up to other broadcasters or newspapers to do so.
-
Some people need to be offended.
-
As I said, everyone else can offend them.
-
Why do they have no obligation to print it?
-
Edited by Engrapadora: 1/14/2015 6:49:19 PMPart of free speech is the freedom to [i]not[/i] say something you don't want to say.
