{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
12/29/2014 4:11:53 PM
4
Yes, I honestly don't play as much crucible as I do strikes because it takes much much longer to earn the crucible marks.
English
-
[quote]Yes, I honestly don't play as much crucible as I do strikes because it takes much much longer to earn the crucible marks.[/quote] Exactly! Now if it was 6 marks for winning instead of 3 and you got a better chance at getting good rewards for coming in 1st 2nd or 3rd would you play more and try a lot harder?
-
There is little incentive to win as you only get 1 mark more. So I do agree it would help people try harder to win with more marks at stake.
-
Yes, I would even be happy with 5 for winning. An average lvl 26 strike is finished under 10 minutes for 6 marks while crucible Is about 12min for half the marks. This has always bugged me but I have never seen that many threads about it so I assumed it will never change.
-
[quote]Yes, I would even be happy with 5 for winning. An average lvl 26 strike is finished under 10 minutes for 6 marks while crucible Is about 12min for half the marks. This has always bugged me but I have never seen that many threads about it so I assumed it will never change.[/quote] It sucks because so many vanguard marks can be obtained but not many places to spend them. Where on the other hand crucible marks can be spent in multiple places but take forever to get!
