{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
12/5/2014 4:49:28 AM
6
All I wanna know is wtf did they spend 500 mil on in this gane cuz it sure as shit doesnt look or feel like 500 mil worth of content. Golden eye for n64 was cheaper to make and had a better storyline, more guns.... with more accurate stats and better multiplayer than this lol
English
-
Gosh it does lurk perdy though, don't it??? ;)
-
Ya! Its all smooth and neat looking with minimal lens flares. At least we know from that aspect jj Abrams didnt direct it
-
Damn!!! How bad is it in the second one!!! Some of the scenes on the Enterprise are brutal. Specifically the one with Mr.Sulu comes to mind. You physically and literally can't see his face! LOL
-
Lol yeah right? I liked intonthe darkness more than the first one but I have little hope of a lens flare free star wars
-
Edited by Niles_Paine_: 12/5/2014 5:46:40 AMI agree in terms of production/storyline but in terms of flares, second one is also by far worse than the first! His wife called him out on it, so I doubt Star Wars will be as brutal. Happy wife, happy life!! ;) While we're on it, that damn Trailer gave me chills! Of course it won't meet most people's standards but looks to be going in a great direction!
-
Lol ya very true.... if lens flares are in real life as bad as they are in his movies itll be called the JJ effect :P
