{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
8/12/2014 7:15:37 PM
10
> [url=http://www.gamespot.com/articles/tomb-raider-fails-to-reach-sales-target/1100-6405929/]Complain that the previous multiplatform Tomb Raider didn't sell enough[/url]
> Make the next game a single console exlusive.
> kek
English
-
Not only that but sell it on the console that's selling the least...
-
And the first one sold less on both 360 and Xbone than it did on PS3 and PS4.
-
I face desked so hard I broke my teeth and keyboard keys. Don't ask how I'm typing this right now... If it was a deal with Sony, that'd make more sense...
-
It'd still be a shitty thing to do.
-
Maybe morally, but at least it'd make more sense from a business standpoint but Microsoft?? What the hell? Surely they could've allowed them to release it on PC at the very least??
-
[quote]but at least it'd make more sense from a business standpoint [/quote]But it really doesn't. Squeenix complained about the sales of last years Tomb Raider game, even though it sold over 4 million and was across 5 different platforms. Limiting it to one platforms, especially the one the previous game sold the least on, makes no sense from a business standpoint.
-
Let me rephrase that; it'd be less illogical than releasing it on the Xbox One, but it would still be very, very, very illogical. Better?
-
It would make sense if MS offered to fund and publish the game like Nintendo did with Bayonetta 2 but I don't think they are.
-
Edited by BannedLemön: 8/13/2014 9:27:17 AMSqueenix have gone incoherent.
-
You never go full retard....but they did.
