{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
8/9/2014 8:48:58 PM
28
-
Brah. There was no ghost in it
-
It's nice that you think that:)
-
The word blind, in denial, or just dumb crosses my mind. Ghost isn't blue at all...
-
The term confirmation bias just crossed my mind.
-
What?
-
Did you look at the picture or are you blind, in denial or too dumb to see that blue thing the VOIDWALKER Warlock is holding in her hand. It's not the ghost, but it sure as hell isn't related to any Arc Subclass either
-
Edited by Darth Lore: 8/11/2014 1:20:42 AM*Sigh* this is gonna be quick, if its not a ghost....hen why are you here talking about both of them if its not that? Axion and Axiom bolt isn't blue if you're referring to those...void is purple.
-
Edited by DawnBlue: 8/11/2014 1:33:10 AMCan you, like, look at the picture? Would save you from looking stupid. Did I at any single god damn point refer to any abilities Voidwalker has or claim it's related to the Subclass in general? What you see in it is a similar, irrelevant visual animation as in the video that the Warlock class has. It was in the Alpha and it was in the Beta - with the Voidwalker Subclass. You people can't defeat your own confirmation bias - you are so sure there is a third Subclass that if there is anything in anywhere that is blue and related to the Warlock you see it as proof that Warlock has an Arc-based Subclass.
-
Nope, you defeat yourself and or look stupid by insulting me for thinking there's a third subclass. Sad, but that's none of my business. The proof is there being more boxes for the ability menu and or 2/3 supers have been shown on the app itself. I could just solo you like everyone else, but you're not even worth that since you went straight to insults. Oh, and before you say I insulted him, I didn't. I insulted his opinion towards the object at hand. Your turn.
-
[quote]The proof is there being more boxes for the ability menu and or 2/3 supers have been shown on the app itself.[/quote] You really gonna use the "proof" that's the easiest to debunk? Oh wait, yeah, you only brought this up after you realized the old "proof" won't work. You either don't follow Destiny news and shouldn't be discussing the topic here OR you know as well as I do that Subclasses can be locked to get a stat bonus and a new copy and that 2/3 you see is just 2/3 Subclass slots being used. Lock one and you get a total of 3, with one being a copy of the locked ones.
-
Source of what you say that you apparently follow so much? By source I mean official bungie source not forum speculation.
-
Source for what? For locking Subclasses? [quote]Destiny allows you to freely swap your ability choices, but according to Green there comes a point when you can lock them in. This gives your Guardian benefits, such as a stat boost. At this point you get a copy of the same focus, but that copy levels up much faster, thus allowing experimentation.[/quote] http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2014-04-30-how-destiny-turns-into-diablo-when-you-hit-the-level-cap I'm constantly surprised by such requests, as I'd expect everyone to know how this works by now
-
Edited by Shogun: 8/11/2014 3:49:39 AMNo, you said the third box on the subclass was for when you lock your subclass in so shoe me a source for that. I would also like to point out just because this is the internet doesn't mean you have to be a complete douche just saying. If you require more explaination, you said: [quote][quote]The proof is there being more boxes for the ability menu and or 2/3 supers have been shown on the app itself.[/quote] You really gonna use the "proof" that's the easiest to debunk? Oh wait, yeah, you only brought this up after you realized the old "proof" won't work. You either don't follow Destiny news and shouldn't be discussing the topic here OR you know as well as I do that Subclasses can be locked to get a stat bonus and a new copy and that 2/3 you see is just 2/3 Subclass slots being used. Lock one and you get a total of 3, with one being a copy of the locked ones.[/quote] Where is there an official statement saying that locking a subclass makes 3/3? I have yet to see this on bungie. Edit: by the way that was a eurogamer source not a bungie source although I will accept it even if it is not what I asked. Try to use bungie sources please.
-
Oh I never meant to prove that exactly what it's for. That's just how I prove that there are other logical reasons for the 2/3 Subclass slots showing - it's not proof of a 3rd Subclass. I'm not claiming that there is no 3rd Subclass, I'm only trying to show those who seem dead set on it that they are probably wrong and make sure nobody else joins the religion. They say 2/3 slots prove that there is 3 Subclasses but I present another perfectly logical reason for it (the fact that locking a Subclass gives a new copy). There are other reasons to assume there are only 2 Subclasses too. More diversity between classes when you can't have everything. End-game content makes more sense when you can't just swap everyone to the best damage type for a raid encounter where all enemies have Arc-type shields, for example. By the way, the article is interviewing Bungie, not pulling stuff out of their asses.
-
By you're rational a 3rd subclass is still more logical. There are 3 elements and three classes which in itself supports that theory, diversity can still be found just because all classes can use all elements doesn't mean that they are all the same. You can be high DPS and not have any defense and still not get anywhere because you get OHKO'd every class and every element they have use them in different manners. I believe there will be a third subclass because using that extra box after looking a subclass just to get to make one over defeats the purpose of locking a subclass. I believe locking just like weapons locks in your choices of said subclass. I see your point and who knows you maybe right but I see that as a lot more flawed than the 3 subclass theory because all in all that just makes a lot more sense when you look at all the evidence.
-
Edited by DawnBlue: 8/11/2014 9:42:11 AM[quote]I believe there will be a third subclass because using that extra box after looking a subclass just to get to make one over defeats the purpose of locking a subclass. I believe locking just like weapons locks in your choices of said subclass.[/quote]I did just link you an official source where a Bungie employee tells you what happens when you lock a Subclass you get a fresh copy of it. The "3 elements, 3 Subclasses" theory never made any sense. You don't get to use every element with any class in just about any other RPG game. Another thing is, have you considered what it would mean if locking a Subclass meant you can't use anything else in it anymore? [i]Almost every skill in every Subclass can be changed between themselves on the go.[/i] There is NO WAY you are gonna be forced to live with your choices when the diversity between them is so great you can't just make a cookie-cutter build and hope it works out well for everything. That leaves us two options: either nobody ever locked their Subclass or the consequences are a little less serious.
-
Like I said you maybe right who knows.
-
No comment on the fact that you claimed my source isn't solid?
-
Here is a cookie. That is want you wanted correct?
-
Edited by DawnBlue: 8/11/2014 11:46:24 PMNo... I just wondered if you got it, lol. That's all. I hate people misunderstanding things, like on an OCD level (hence the fact that I'm here at all, showing people why the OP of this thread is wrong with the video-animation-proves-3rd-subclass thing)
-
Yeah I agree as I commented on one of your pics that definitely does not prove anything.
-
The animation for pulling it out is. XD
-
No, its a scan...
-
This is a really stupid thing to argue about I have better things to do.
-
Blows my mind how anyone thinks that's a ghost. [i]Yes[/i], it looks similar, but unless your watching from a million miles away you can plainly see it's [i]NOT[/i] a ghost. Jeez. I can listen to reasonable doubt but this is just plain dumb. Please take an extra minute to realize it's not a ghost.
