{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
Edited by Gaara444:
6/30/2014 4:17:23 PM
4
Good.
Sandra Fluke is a sexist liar that purposely distorts the language in order to appeal to emotions.
A corporation refusing to pay for your birth control is NOT denying your access to birth control, just because someone refuses to pay for the services you want does not mean they are denying you access to them. If I wanted you to buy me dinner, and you refused, you are not denying me access to dinner. This is NOT a difficult concept.
English
-
Refusing to buy you dinner is an entirely different thing than part of an employee's insurance.
-
Not putting Birth Control on part of an employee's insurance is not denying them access to birth control. Just because an employer doesn't pay for a service you want, does NOT mean they are preventing you from getting that service, that is the whole point in paying employees in currency and not just goods and services. If employers are barring their employees from buying birth control THAT is denying them access, but refusing to pay for birth control is not.
-
i agree
-
It's not a part of the employees insurance now is it?
