Emo Joe89 makes some really great points. As for your question if ODST armor could be made for today's battlefield the answer is yes. We have the technology for the armor and hud. The problem is just funding.
English
-
Thanks for your agreement, but the problem isn't just funding, you also have to consider practicality and implementation. As a very simple example, consider the way weapons function with the HUD in ODST, or any Halo game. Somewhere on the ODST is a computer that is aware that one weapon being carried by the soldier is in use, and another is not in use. This computer provides information on where the used weapon is aiming, and knows when to ignore information about the other weapon when it is not in use. Not only can it differentiate between the weapon in the soldier's hands and the one on their back/hip, but it can differentiate between weapons in the general vicinity and used by other individuals. That's a lot of technology for wireless communication and batteries and computer hardware and software that has to be on EVERY weapon and soldier bodysuit just so that the soldiers with a HUD can have a reticle display on their HUD to help them aim... and aren't soldiers supposed to be trained to aim without that technology anyway? It's a case of massive cost and minimal payoff. It is impractical. Yes, you can probably implement such a system with the proper funding and resources, but who's going to allocate money for such a thing? Wouldn't taxpayers be outraged by such a thing? Who are we going to war with that would necessitate this sort of extremely marginal benefit? Even if the human race WERE being attacked by an alien race like in the Halo universe, wouldn't it be better to use all of that technology and resources on other things like better communications equipment for pilots? Long story short, the whole thing is an idea from a work of science fiction which in all likelihood will never happen in real life the same way it's depicted.
-
When I said HUD I wasn't actually talking about a reticle or the ability to differentiate between weapons. I was talking about being able to make targets with the help of drones and satellites. Similar to the Ghost Recon games. That technology would be major. It would allow soldiers to have all enemy targets marked that can be seen from a predator drone or a UAV even if that enemy target was behind a wall or prone on a mountain top. A HUD could also have health monitors (heart rate etc.) so battlefield leaders and medics could monitor soldiers. However the reticle technology could be used in a different way. If we incorporated ballistic computes into a HUD via some form of "reticle" it would allow for long range engagements without needing the soldier to calculate everything. Now we do have ballistic computers already but incorporating it into a HUD could cut the input time allowing soldiers to engage targets at long range immediately. We are already testing a form of this technology in the new "smart" sniper rifles. But a HUD would allow any soldier to make these shots. In my opinion this is something worth investing in.