{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
3/30/2014 7:07:46 PM
65
-
Would everyone shut up its a game and people have there opinions on why its good or bad and its not cool if you just go around saying there wrong for liking it because in reality there is no right and wrong only opinions so there you have it.
-
more like the nerds who hate it
-
But their are actually reasons to hate it.....
-
>votes gop
-
-
>Using nerd as an insult Maybe because they like the game? Who'd of thunk it? Not everyone has the same opinions, and not everyone plays Halo for MP.
-
I get that some people "like" the game. But I've yet to hear one legit reason on why someone would like it.
-
Because they like the new stuff? That's a valid reason as any. A lot of people here like it because of the campaign.
-
[quote]A lot of people here like it because of the campaign.[/quote] Thats understandable. But I've never heard a valid reason to like the multiplayer. Theres no 10+ halo veterans like myself who actually like this garbage.
-
Why would anyone like Reach. Being a veteran of Halo myself, Halo 4 is tied with my favorites and is a fantastic game.
-
It has less randomness than H4. I'm not saying I liked Reach. It was actually pretty bad. But it was better than H4.
-
That is extremely false. Reach was broken and unbalanced, Halo 4 is perfectly fine.
-
Both games were broken and unbalanced. Luckily, the Zero Bloom and No Sprint update to reach made the game playable and on pay with H3.
-
Not at all, only Reach. Ah, the one 343 implemented. I agree their version of Reach is infinitely superior to the abominable mess Bungie delivered.
-
Yes, 343 did a great job fixing reach. Thats why I thought they would make a great H4. Listen, I still have hope for Halo 5 (And hopefully H2A). I think they will actually listen to the competitive community because of how big a failure H4 was.
-
Except it wasn't at all a failure.
-
Having a 15k peak population IS Failure.
-
Not at all. And it often gets far above that, not to mention as you stated it's the 13th most played game on Live. That's a failure to you? For a company's first game no less that already had pressure against them and a mess to clean up.
-
[quote]Not at all. And it often gets far above that[/quote] An 18k weekend is "far" above that? [quote]not to mention as you stated it's the 13th most played game on Live. That's a failure to you? [/quote] yes absoutley. Halo anywhere outside of the top 5, this recent after their release (17 months), is an absoutle failure to me.
-
[quote] Theres no 10+ halo veterans like myself who actually like this garbage.[/quote] *cough* It's average but what do you expect with people being so divided.
-
Edited by BannedLemön: 3/30/2014 11:32:46 PM[quote]But I've never heard a valid reason to like the multiplayer. [/quote][quote]Because they like the new stuff? That's a valid reason as any. [/quote]I take it you just ignored this part? [quote]Theres no 10+ halo veterans like myself who actually like this garbage.[/quote]Uh-huh. Because you know everyone, right? I also fail to see how that's relevant.
-
They like the new stuff? Why? Because its unbalanced? Its relevant because the ONLY reason you could like H4 is because you have never played CE-3.
-
[quote]you have never played CE-3.[/quote] lmao
-
Care to elaborate?
-
You automatically assume that if someone likes Halo 4 then it means they haven't played previous Halo games...
