{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
Edited by MoReCoWbELLx2x1:
2/27/2014 3:11:59 AM
13
Implying freedom of speech applies to harassing and messing with cops. And interfering with an arrest.
Implying that freedom of speech is even the issue here.
Ugg I told myself I wouldn't comment. Shame on you cowbell, shame.
English
-
I never made such an implication, that simply never happened here. The only ones doing the harassing were the cops. It is. You shouldn't have, because, once again, you only humiliated yourself.
-
He wasn't harassing. It's not illegal to record police officers making an arrest.
-
obstruction of justice
-
Edited by Fallen Hero: 2/27/2014 11:13:28 AMFrom across the street with a camera? No, It won't stick seeing as he didn't physically obstruct them and the people were already handcuffed.
-
The only ones obstructing justice were the criminal cops.
-
Edited by MoReCoWbELLx2x1: 2/27/2014 3:17:24 AMYour right, it's not. And that's not even why the cops got mad. You people like to take things out of context. 1) When performing arrest, especially of multiple people involving such as it did, cops are suppose to create a "area" if you will say. Which is why they told him and everybody to move back. It's when the idiot started screaming "free rights!" "Filming" for no reason and not listening to the cop, that the cops get mad. 2) The cops didn't get mad until the guy wouldn't listen to them. Because he felt like being annoying, and not listening to the cops while they are doing their job. 3) You people over react.
-
Edited by Fallen Hero: 2/27/2014 12:03:01 PM[quote] 1) When performing arrest, especially of multiple people involving such as it did, cops are suppose to create a "area" if you will say. Which is why they told him and everybody to move back. It's when the idiot started screaming "free rights!" "Filming" for no reason and not listening to the cop, that the cops get mad.[/quote] I'd like to read these rules. Funny how they singled out the camera guy and weren't harassing any other bystanders. [quote]2)The cops didn't get mad until the guy wouldn't listen to them. Because he felt like being annoying, and not listening to the cops while they are doing their job.[/quote] You don't have to blindly follow everything an officer says. Police have been known to break the law too and recording them keeps them in check. He didn't physically obstruct justice. I'd like to see the rules for how big these perimeters have to be because if they were setting up a perimeter all they would of had to do was tell him to move back another 25 feet or so and he could continue recording. Saying "You have no -blam!-ing rights" doesn't sound like just setting up a perimeter, it sounds like an over stepping of boundaries.
-
1. No, he singled him out and told him to quit filming when her was perfectly allowed to film. That's why he started defending his rights. 2. NO ONE should listen to unjust orders. I certainly wouldn't. The only ones being annoying were the cops. Their job is not to infringe on others. 3. No, you're simply a naive moron. (Look at your horrible cannabis arguments, or rather lack thereof)
-
*yawn* Are you done now?
-
I was "done" proving you incompetent since the first time I responded to your asinine comment.
-
Obviously not
-
Obviously, that's why you shut up when you realized how moronic you sounded.
-
[quote]*yawn* Are you done now?[/quote]
