{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
originally posted in:Sapphire
Edited by DeclinedA1:
2/6/2014 1:43:06 AM
16
I was a Libertarian before I realized it was a waste of vote. I see now that the best course of action would be to get libertarian minded Republicans into office.
English
-
Like Ron Paul? :D
-
Edited by cxkxr: 2/6/2014 7:11:38 PMNo, the more practical Paul.
-
Sure.
-
To bad he retired ;(
-
Ron Paul is the hero we need, not the hero we deserve.
-
That would be better than having Republican-minded Republicans, I suppose, but if a candidate is not socially conservative, the Republican mainstream and Fox News will probably tear him a new asshole.
-
You can have all the social progression you want but without a fiscally strong country then it won't do any good fiscal>social
-
Fiscal conservatism is not necessarily good fiscal policy, something conservatives like to forget.
-
It's [i]certainly[/i] better than racking up more debt..
-
That's assuming fiscal conservatism doesn't rack up debt... Which it often does.
-
Your definition of fiscal conservatism obviously differs from mine...
-
Clearly, yours seems to be "magical flawless policy immune to all debt and abuse".
-
Edited by cxkxr: 2/6/2014 7:21:25 PMlol, I'm not even going to waste my time schooling you on economics... The fact you think debt is inevitable, shows you know little to nothing about monetary policy or [i]how[/i] debt is even accumulated.
-
I'm looking at Detroit right now
-
And I'm looking at Sweden.
-
Edited by DeclinedA1: 2/6/2014 2:16:37 AMMany of the younger Republican(<50) are more focused on fiscal issues than social. Although the social issues are the ones that turn many people off from the GOP.
