{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
1/9/2014 6:32:17 PM
9
NO NO NO NO NO
ANY ATTEMPT TO PROHIBIT ANYONE FROM OWNING ANY TYPE OF FIREARM IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND TANTAMOUNT TO TREASON. ANYONE WHO EVEN THINKS OF EVER PROPOSING SUCH A THING SHOULD BE SHOT.
English
-
#notgettingit
-
What do you mean? I played the part of the angry "muh gunz n freedumbs" amurican that flies into a fury when hearing or seeing "limited gun ownership". You don't have to read the OP to do that.
-
Read the last paragraph carefully. Who does it describe?
-
Everyone on b.net. That wasn't the point of my post though.
-
Who is adamantly pro pot, loves the female behind and like to play tactical games...
-
Edited by Lord Commissar: 1/9/2014 7:07:35 PMI know you're trying to point out Camnator, but there are many other people here that a fit that exact description too. Once again though, not the point of my post.
-
Serious reply to a not-serious thread
-
The reply wasn't serious though.
-
WITH GUNS
