{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
Edited by Quantum:
1/4/2014 3:43:04 AM
3
[quote]Horse shit, Harry Potter's last two movies were both on the 7th book and they still shit all over what Rowling wrote in the book. The Lord of The Rings Trilogy is a more faithful adaptation even if the last movie sucked [/quote]
...No. Harry Potter managed to sustain most of the major plot points.
LOTR did not. I don't think people realize how different the characters are in the movies compared to the books. Especially the 3rd movie.
English
-
[quote]Harry Potter managed to sustain most of the major plot points. [/quote] Deathly Hallows Part 1, where Ron says the illusion of Harry and Hermione together. Never picked back up again for the rest of the story. It just kind of "happened" and the two of them pretend to forget all about it immediately afterwards. The part of the book was handled poorly in the movie.
-
As opposed to LOTR where an entire army (the Easterlings) were shown in one scene only?
-
he's got you there, gargar
