Call of Duty has been relatively the same since World at War. They're running out of gimmicks to do that other FPS games are also doing. Do I commend them for starting up Zombies? iirc, Gears 2 had Horde Mode, which is pretty much the same thing. I could also say that the Fear games had a type of Horde mode as well, and Fear 1 definitely came out before Call of Duty: World at War, where Zombies was first introduced. Can I say the same thing about Spec Ops? An objective system isn't really new. It's fun, yes, but it's recycled as well. Call of Duty is nowhere near perfect, but it's not as bad as metacritic users make it to be. Is it 10/10? Definitely not. Dark Souls is easily a higher score in terms of replayability, enjoyment, and plot. Dark Souls wasn't even meant to be a popular game, but it is now. I'd rate Call of Duty to be somewhere around 6.5-7.5/10. It's decent, but it doesn't impress. It's recycled, like every other FPS game in the market that has emphasis in Multiplayer. Can I say that a game like Bioshock Infinite is better than the recent Call of Duty games (barring Ghosts)? Yes. Infinite had a great plot and it was something that kept me interested (And still is keeping my interest in it) for a while. I'm not saying anything about Ghosts until I have played it, but from the other Call of Duty games, they seek to look pretty, not to impress people. That's about it.

lolcod getting a 10? Buhahaha

welcome? agreed; but you, as the intellectual savior, must enlighten the worthy.