{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
Edited by Elrond Hubbard:
10/24/2013 8:58:52 PM
4
These are only the minimum requirements. Not to be confused with the recommended specs.
Usually the minimum requirements for games seems to be the absolute bare minimum, ishiggydiggy 2006-level hardware. Like, you might lucky if you can even install the game [i]at all[/i] on a computer like that. Like Battlefield 4, for example, the minimum specs for that game are basically Battlefield 2's recommended specs.
For all we know, IW decided on [i]reasonable[/i] minimum specs.
But 40GB, now [i]that's[/i] insane. I would never buy a PC game that has a base install that huge.
English
-
[quote]This means next to nothing.[/quote] It shows that the PC port is going to be a horribly unoptimized piece of garbage. That does mean quite a bit actually.
-
Edited by Elrond Hubbard: 10/24/2013 9:03:57 PM[Edited that line out of my post because I changed my mind, but whatevs] Or, like I said, IW decided on reasonable minimum specs. As in, not a punchline, but hardware that can actually run the game with playable framerates.
-
Edited by Lord Commissar: 10/24/2013 9:06:59 PMIt's Infinity Ward. You're giving them to much credit, especially when given the horrible optimizations of the past COD games on the PC.
-
[quote]It's Infinity Ward. You're giving them to much credit, especially when given the horrible optimizations of the past COD games on the PC.[/quote] That's a good point, I wasn't thinking of that.
