-
Point being that nobody should be good at a game that they haven't played in 2 years.
-
You cant be serious?
-
Why wouldn't I be? If you haven't touched it in 2 years, TWO YEARS, you shouldn't bea nearly as good at it as you were before.
-
Edited by God Of Men: 10/5/2013 8:00:52 AMI disagree. I haven't played CoD 4 since MW2 came out, but a few months ago my buddies and I decided to hop on. Every game I grabbed around a 2.0 K/D (games without modders).
-
Edited by Guntyype: 10/5/2013 6:31:05 AMIf Halo was more of a twitch shooter I could understand. But you already had the knowledge of a competitive player. Its something you don't forget. And a majority of players don't have that part down. Would I expect you to be at 50/onyx level first game compared to those that still play? Unlikely. But we are talking about social playlists, where the average player has no idea what they are doing.
-
Nah, I was done with reach by February of 2011. Besides, it's 2013, and there's a newer Halo game on the market for nearly a year now. Fact is, the only people left on Reach are people who couldn't afford Halo 4 (and therefore have more experience with Reach than I do) and people who didn't like Halo 4 (and therefore probably have more experience with Reach than I have).
-
Thats a fairly large generalization. Maybe people just like to play Reach. That doesn't mean they all will be halo pros because they play often ie:ksi demon anyone? Look at Halo 3 even in 2013 people still play and have a high skill of 11. I just cant comprehend your flawed logic.
-
It stands to reason that the more one plays, the better one gets until he or she plateaus. If we can't agree on that, we're at an impasse.
-
No, I agree.However that has nothing to do with you being a better than average player who comes back and still beats randoms who play Reach. Whether or not its been two years- five years. The players that will get better were bound too over time just like us but the number is such a small amount.