No, not /thread. TDKR was an absolutely stupid portrayal of Superman. Hell, every Frank Miller comic is pretty stupid in general. All he can do is draw decent cities. Aside from that, he can't tell stories for crap without injecting his bigoted thoughts into them. [url=http://io9.com/5969808/a-childs-treasury-of-horrible-frank-miller-comic-panels]Here's a list of my [least] favorite works by him.[/url] Pay special attention to Holy Terror.

I only know some of his work, but that doesn't detract from my love for TDKR. I loved the animated films too, despite the lack of Batman's narrative. Hell, if I remember rightly, Miller was responsible for [i]Robocop 2[/i] and that was awful. Even [i]that[/i] doesn't alter my opinion of TDKR. You are entitled to your own opinion and all, but... [i]Obvious butthurt Superman fan is obvious.[/i]

A) I'm not saying your opinion is wrong, just saying I wouldn't like a TDKR adaptation. B) Butthurt? I got over TDKR a long time ago, but it still remains as the worst portrayal of Superman I've ever seen, and arguably one of the worst of Batman too. "BUT TEH REVLUSHUNAIZD TEH COMEX" A dark, gritty take was what "revolutionized" comics. Not the actual character themselves. In TDKR Batman is an impulsive moron. He lets Alfred die so he can go punch a mutant in the face as "that's all he sees." He's pretty much a criminal. Stark contrast to Grant Morrison's paranoid Batman.

I bet Batman is going to rub his cock all over Superman's face, like a windscreen wiper.