{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
9/22/2013 10:17:51 PM
17
-
I take it you didn't look through the massive amount of links [url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17419812]supporting[/url] [url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18086100]the[/url] [url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3042320/]article's[/url] [url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23937309]viewpoint.[/url]
-
>Implying those aren't biased.
-
Edited by Elrond Hubbard: 9/22/2013 10:25:30 PM>Uganda >Kenya Nope, no bias there.
-
You could say the same thing about all of the links to the articles promoting non-circumcision, eh? Stop blaming losing a flap of skin from your crotch on your problems.
-
That's a nice strawman you have there. All of those places are known for having significant rates of the cut. You never hear doctors in, say, the UK, talking about how the cut is going to have so many benefits and whatever. Not to say that the benefits don't exist, because they clearly do, it's just that the cut does not justify denying someone the basic human right to body integrity.
-
the only benefits are in 3rd world countries, where bathing/proper hygiene is not a regular option. should you have your organs removed to remove your risk of cancer? same logic behind that as circumcision having medical benefits.
-
There's more than what I linked in my post and I have more important things to do than impress an internet tough guy with links he could fish out himself if he so chose, so unless you actually read through the damned thing we're done talking.
-
Insulting me, now? Wow, here I was hoping to have an intelligent discussion. I guess that was just silly of me to expect such a thing.
-
I guess it's too much to ask for an intelligent conversation with a man who holds a flap of useless wang skin in such high regard, right? I'm talking about you, by the way.
-
I've been respectful this entire time. You resorted to name-calling.
-
I've been trying to goad you into giving proper responses through anger, but that doesn't seem to be working. I'll just refer you to your first post in this thread, and leave it at that.
-
Don't you know anything? Using anger is a great way to [i]not[/i] win people over to your cause.
-
I'm not trying to convince you, I'm trying to get a proper argument out of you. I've pointed that out to you, but I guess you don't want to. Have fun lamenting your lost wang sheath for the rest of your life, maybe you can get a surgeon to graft a new one on to you so you'll stop flooding this forum with your bitching.
-
Edited by Elrond Hubbard: 9/22/2013 11:59:59 PMIf you're going to create straw man arguments and attempt to insult me like that, why should I give you the satisfaction of a proper debate? For all you know, I'm an uncutfag.
-
You wouldn't keep moaning about this myth if it weren't about your removed wang skin. I mean, I'd understand if you did. If you're having troubles or feel unsatisfied with your wang it's easier to play the blame game than to get over it. If you have your wang skin still, I'd suggest you have it cut off to prove to the rest of the flood how BS this whole 'wang skin makes your dyke feel better' myth is, if the studies performed suggesting that this is a myth aren't convincing enough. Honestly though, I don't. No one who still has their wang skin would waste all their time on an internet forum whining about it.
-
Edited by Elrond Hubbard: 9/23/2013 12:18:58 AMThat's certainly not the case, but what difference does it make? I have a valid argument, and your immature, ad hominem attacks reflect poorly on you. lol muted
-
K then, have fun circle-jerking it with all the other 'intactivists'. I mean, it's not like you didn't address the studies linked to the article how uncut penises feel better is all bullshit, right?
