{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
This thread is inspired by another: view original post
9/22/2013 3:51:11 PM
40
To those making THIS argument...
[quote]Even if you like that your parents had you cut doesn't make it right.
If you did not consent to it, and there was no medical emergency that required it, your parents violated your rights when they had your dick cut.
Body integrity is a basic human right. That means that you are entitled to your whole body even if other people don't agree with it.
What is so wrong with respecting personal autonomy?[/quote]If you are going to make this claim, then you also have to make the claim that you didn't CHOOSE to be BORN, and therefore, being born is a violation of your right to choose.
I mean, if you admit to being an anti-natalist, great. Excellent. Join the party. We need more of those in society.
But if you AREN'T an anti-natalist, you aren't allowed to make this bogus "right to choose" argument.
-
22 Replies in this Sub-ThreadYou didn't choose whether or not to be born because there was no "you" to make [i]any[/i] choices before you were born. You didn't exist in any form capable of thought. As such, you had no rights, since one cannot have rights if one does not exist.
-
Brilliant argument. You had no foresight, nor did you know what the future was. You didn't know what [i]anything[/i] was, since you were just DNA in two different cells, incapable of thought or choice. So others chose [i]for[/i] you. And what a mistake [i]that[/i] was...
-
[quote]You had no foresight, nor did you know what the future was. [/quote]I'm [i]OBVIOUSLY[/i] talking about the parents and the people who ARE alive and DO exist. Any RETARD could have figured that out. Shoot yourself.
-
-
