{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
9/17/2013 4:42:25 AM
7
-
Not really... Obama is the leading liberal in America. He fits the description in it's entirety.
-
Hitler was the leading conservative in [url=http://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin%27s_law]-godwinslaw!-[/url] Germany, so I guess he should be the standard we compare all conservatives to as well, right?
-
godwinslaw is pretty lame. Its just a word.
-
[url=http://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin%27s_law]-godwinslaw!-[/url] [url=http://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin%27s_law]-godwinslaw!-[/url] [url=http://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin%27s_law]-godwinslaw!-[/url] [url=http://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin%27s_law]-godwinslaw!-[/url]
-
No. I'm talking modern era politics. Thomas Jefferson was a liberal in his day, but would be considered a conservative/libertarian today. And Hitler might've been called a conservative 70 years ago, but today we call him a fascist, socialist, kinda like uhhh... Obama... Liberals love Batack Hussein. So I use their leader as the prime example of what they believe.
-
Stepping near along the fine line of Poe's law, I see?
-
I don't reckon?
