{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
9/15/2013 5:27:31 PM
9
>Halo: CE is higher than Halo 3, Halo 2, and Halo: Reach
>Halo 4 is higher than Halo: Reach
Top lel
Halo: CE was great for it's time, but the sequels were an improvement in so many ways. Halo 4 was a downgrade from Reach.
English
-
It's not about nostalgic value or which game is "still the most fun to play" or something like that. A lot of their reasons for placement on this list were how much of a trailblazer a game was or how ambitious or unique it is, and affects on the rest of the genre. That's why Battlefield 3 is placed way down at #90 and Bad Company 2 is somewhere around the 40s... because Battlefield 3 is essentially the same game as Bad Company 2 but with a lot more polish.
-
I have no nostalgic value for Halo CE, and I honestly think it is a very over-rated game. 10 years ago? Yeah, maybe it was amazing, but now?
-
lol, Halo 3 was bad compared to Halo: CE.
-
topkek
-
Maybe slightly. Reach had more enjoyable scenarios, but H4's harder, more futuristic scifi aesthetic, counter to Reach's grounded, militaristic style, made H4 feel much more fun.
-
Edited by Kalameet: 9/15/2013 5:34:24 PMYeah, but downgraded forge, customs, and theatre were disappointing, as was the lack of playable Elites.
-
I didn't say it was flawless, but 343 nailed the pure gunplay, not to mention the aesthetic and the narrative was mostly great.
