{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
Edited by noballsorhands:
7/22/2013 3:56:34 PM
13
The developers are retarded for making a "Free To Play" game for the 360 which requires a gold membership.
English
-
sleeprsleepr - old
Why? PS4 will also require PS+ membership to play online and yet some f2p games will still be playable without it! The choice it's up to the developers. -
all f2p games on the ps4 do NOT require a plus membership. This has already been confirmed.
-
sleepr
sleepr - old
It's a developer choice, some may require plus membership to play. -
Edited by Failure4Life: 7/22/2013 6:58:11 PMI'm an idiot and misread your post, sorry.
-
sleepr
sleepr - old
No problem. ;) -
Edited by Dylan is Grump: 7/22/2013 6:43:45 PM[spoiler]whoops[/spoiler]
-
sleepr
sleepr - old
You said something? PS2 and DCUO? Didn't catch the rest. :p -
thats up to Sony and Microsoft.
-
sleepr
sleepr - old
Exactly. And the problem is Microsoft policy is not good enough for free to play games, that's the reason why the guy is complaining even though he should have thought about that before signing the deal. -
Yes, But the developer is just as stupid for even starting development for a "free to play" xbox360 game.
-
Since when did multi-player games ever not required a gold membership to play.
-
Edited by sleepr: 7/22/2013 4:26:51 PM
sleepr
sleepr - old
They don't. Microsoft could allow some multiplayer games to be played without requiring Gold, yet they don't. -
Exactly. Idk why they thought it would be different. It would be like telling your boss that you don't have to work since they hired you. You know what your getting into when you accept to do things.
