This thread is inspired by another: view original post
-
24 Replies in this Sub-ThreadOh ya, and there are over 1,300 architects and engineers who agree the buildings should not have fallen. Including the person that designed the twin towers who said a plane hitting the building would be akin to shoving a pencil through a screen door. http://www.ae911truth.org/news/41-articles/407-buildingwhat-appears-on-geraldo-at-large-on-fox-news.html
-
No, a test was done, and the support columns won't melt at all. They were heated enough to weaken their structural integrity. Also, do you see how close Tower 7 is? The twin towers are huge! All that falling rubble and debris would be more than enough to trash tower 7.
-
Then why did the government fail to mention it in the report? Right before the building "collapsed" it seemed stable and fine, not to mentioned it looked EXACTLY like a controlled demolition and it was reported collapsed before it actually happened. And people said, "Get back they're going to pull it!" Which is a term used in demolition.
-
-