{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
6/28/2013 12:07:52 AM
4
1) who the -blam!- is Rand Paul and why should I give a shit?
2) Nice over generalizations, bro
3) As for your remark about gun control; exactly... now why can't the democrats get it through their head that they can control guns without going full retard trying to do things like ban a gun because it looks scary, even though that model is rarely involved in gun related homicide?
English
-
Rand paul is a reoublican who many believe can be a potential presidential nominee. His pointless filibuster highlights the ridiculousness of republican arguments. If assault rifles are rarely used, why not bann them? You don't need that much firepower to defend yourself rom a criminal and you certainly don't need it to hunt
-
Did you even listen to what I said? I didn't say they want to ban them because of what they can do, they want to ban them [b][url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Assault_Weapons_Ban#Criteria_of_an_assault_weapon]because it looks scary.[/url][/b] Banning something based on aesthetics is completely retarded. That's like banning red cars because they look fast.
-
lol? Please read Obama's gun proposal. I'll even list some of the features that you Republicans find so distasteful: Limit magazines to 10 rounds Bann Armor piercing shells Require background checks for private sales REINSTALL the ban on assault rifles Nominate a director for the ATF (that has been hindered by both GOP and NRA)
-
I'm still trying to find the "bann on scary looking guns" but i'm not seeing it. maybe u can help me?
