{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
6/14/2013 10:06:21 PM
14
Why is it frowned upon to give your child tatoo's?
But it isn't to circumcise them? Both are being done against the child's consent.
-
1 ReplyBecause tattoos can cause permanent damage, while circumcision has some benefits.
-
2 Replieshttp://www.mayoclinic.com/health/circumcision/MY01023/DSECTION=why-its-done [quote][b] Circumcision might have various health benefits, including:[/b] [b]Easier hygiene:[/b] Circumcision makes it simpler to wash the penis. Washing beneath the foreskin of an uncircumcised penis is generally easy, however. [b]Decreased risk of urinary tract infections:[/b] The overall risk of urinary tract infections in males is low, but these infections are more common in uncircumcised males. Severe infections early in life can lead to kidney problems later on. [b]Decreased risk of sexually transmitted infections:[/b] Circumcised men might have a lower risk of certain sexually transmitted infections, including HIV. Still, safe sexual practices remain essential. [b]Prevention of penile problems:[/b] Occasionally, the foreskin on an uncircumcised penis can be difficult or impossible to retract (phimosis). This can lead to inflammation of the foreskin or head of the penis. [b]Decreased risk of penile cancer:[/b] Although cancer of the penis is rare, it's less common in circumcised men. In addition, cervical cancer is less common in the female sexual partners of circumcised men.[/quote]
-
Because it's a tattoo.
-
4 RepliesWhat the -blam!- is a "tatoo" Anyway [quote]Both are being done against the child's consent[/quote] Since when were tattoos given to children without their consent? Are we not talking about civilized societies here?
-
12 RepliesOne is for health reasons, one is for decoration.
-
Jewish conspiracy
-
Stupidest question ever.
-
2 RepliesEdited by Verbatim: 6/14/2013 11:51:13 PMYou give [i]birth[/i] to the child without its consent. I'm sure, at that point, it'll be okay to remove some superfluous baggy crap hanging off his dick. I sure am a lot more concerned about a child getting an ugly drawing on his ass that will eventually warp and distort itself because of skin growth than I am about fucking fore-fucking-skin, jackass.
-
Hypocrisy. I mean tattoos are only semi-permanent, but cutting off your kid's foreskin is forever.
-
1 ReplyBecause tattoos on adults are still viewed as a negative.
-
Edited by Cultmeister: 6/14/2013 10:51:18 PMbecause hypocrits
-
Depends on the tattoo.
-
1 Replytattoo's are ugly that's why.
-
Edited by Uberdawg: 6/14/2013 10:08:27 PMWith the tattoo explosion I'm seeing day-to-day, I'm half-expecting tattooed children to be the next big thing.
