{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
6/9/2013 7:22:43 PM
36
They have a lot to prove after they showed their incompetence with Reach.
English
-
Boohoo I didnt like Reach and have to still talk mad trash on it 3 years later. Go to bed little boy.
-
Practice what you preach. You only like Reach because you're bad and need the game to play for you.
-
Hahahaha positive in every Halo game with at least 1.25. Like I said go to sleep little boy.
-
Edited by Camnator: 6/12/2013 10:18:05 AMThat isn't good! HAHA! You just proved me correct, kiddo.
-
Sorry I have a job, wife and school stuff to do. When you leave your moms basement and be a real adult you will understand. Sorry my thumbs aren't as good as yours you jerk off. Come up to me in a bar and try running your mouth. Oh wait....
-
I also have a job, your point? I'm probably older than you and I KNOW I'm more productive. I'd have no problem saying this in real life, either, and you wouldn't do a dang thing about it, squirt. Nice job destroying YOUR OWN argument, you complete moron.
-
Edited by Commander Tempu: 6/10/2013 3:46:24 PMWell if you can out do Bunige in Reach let us know. Any Halo for that matter. Its not like Forge or any of the other stuff made the game just as good. Nor the Campaign was awesome. Firefight and lets not forget theater. Multi-Player i had fun with and if you are a Reach Sucks cuse i my self want to be a back seat gamer well go make your own game. Bungie Loves us all. Peace Out-Brother Fishbowl.
-
I could EASILY outdo them. THEY BROKE THEIR OWN CANON! Inexcusable.
-
Edited by Commander Tempu: 6/12/2013 10:17:54 AMComing from a some one who was a Troll in the flood. Yes i can see your skills now. One sec. Interview." Writing Skills ?" Cam" I know every thing there is to know on B.net. And i know all there is to know about the Halo universe. More so then Bungie or 343i for that matter" Interviewer." Sorry your skill set does not match up with our Writing Department." Changes were not that bad and i thought they improved the story even more. Blizz breaks there lore all the time. The thing is if they put it back they way its suppose to and has a good timeline i think that is pretty good. Besides Destiny is a new game you going to know it all about that also ? *Chuckles allot.*
-
You believe in mythical creatures? Wow, you're delusional and already discredited your own word.
-
You still believe in Flying Narwhal's so who is kidding who ?
-
I have no idea what that even is.
-
Incompetence huh? Big word. But I guess you know the truth and have all the answers, given your omnipotent powers and your very successful games studio... Oh, wait. Guess this is just your opinion then. Funny, 'cause the way you present your views, it sounds like fact.
-
343 actually ruined it when they took away bloom. Rendered the dmr useless cause the pistol fired faster with the same accuracy and damage. The game was great, people just cant get over change that actually made the game better. The only bad thing was armor lock but thats in other peoples experience. I personally never had a problem with it.
-
Lol armor lock sucked. Sticks would magically fly off of the person. Anyone who used it could take enough damage to kill every single person in the game 5 times and it was cheap. Enough said about that. Its neither here nor there. What matters now is Destiny and how Bungie is once again going to rule the gaming industry.
-
They had to take bloom away because it was broken and promoted spam and punished skill and aiming. The game was far superior without it. If bloom had been implemented correctly I would have been fine with it, but 343 did not ruin the game at all, Bungie did that themselves.
-
Halo: Reach was a great game though. It had beautiful graphics, wonderful new additions to gameplay, and one of the best multiplayer experiences Halo has ever seen. Its only weak point would've been its story, which was still pretty good.
-
It was a joke, the graphics were barely different than the previous game, broken additions to gameplay that were incomplete and had to be fixed by 343 and a good multiplayer once 343 fixed it. The story also broke canon.
-
The graphics argument can be made for just about any other game though :/ I 'strongly liked' reach, though aiming in general was a pain with the iffy bloom. Although 4 is fun, I really miss the slow paced fighting Halo is known for. All this sprinting and easy-to-get-kills gameplay make me miss the older titles, where skill was relevant, not who would be first to get one of the 6 odd instakill weapons.
-
I think that introduces another factor of skill, because I have no problem defending myself from power weapons.
-
True, I guess it is all down to personal preference.
-
Saws on Ragnarok are ridiculous now, though. HAHA!
-
No. Just no.
-
I'm afraid so. Which Halo game was your first?
-
Halo: CE. I'd assume you began with 3?
