{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
This thread is inspired by another: view original post
Edited by Recon Number 54:
6/4/2013 5:38:33 AM
11
Libertarianism is oppressive, only full anarchy gives everyone all their rights of freedom
Consider yourselves out-edged, bitches.
-
Both suck. Argument settled.
-
1 ReplyYou're pretty retarded if you think libertarianism is edgy. Anarchy is pretty damn edgy, but libertarianism isn't at all.
-
Do I not have the right to live?
-
It's true... [spoiler]But good luck to you when me and my pals come around looking for you and the police don't come...[/spoiler]
-
1 ReplyDon't tell me what to do.
-
Watch it, this is an angsty and edgy teen.
-
All anarchy promises is that the guy that kills your wife and molests the cow won't be prosecuted.
-
3 RepliesRemoving everyone's inherent rights doesn't make everyone an equal, it just makes everyone else a target. We need some kind of government to maintain order and peace, because let's face it, humans are assholes.
-
7 RepliesTrue anarchy will never be possible, without the government's monopoly of force, people will crack heads together, kill each other, and eventually form their own administrative background. If the US became an anarchy tomorrow and everyone knew it, you'd see the country divided into hundreds of little "tribal" zones.
-
11 RepliesAnarchy doesn't give everyone all their rights of freedom. The strong will overpower the weak, denying the weak their freedoms. The only way for true freedom is the Matrix.
-
Anarchy would be far superior to what we have now. Government has simply become obsolete and incompetent due to information being readily available and the fact we are all connected. Private enterprise is the way to progress.
