{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
5/25/2013 10:00:07 PM
12
Except unless the PS4 has server lists the Xbox is superior, so by your logic, assuming the PS4 is not going to have server lists, the PS4 also blows.
English
-
The Xbox is quantifiably inferior, laughably inferior in fact. http://www.anandtech.com/show/6972/xbox-one-hardware-compared-to-playstation-4/2
-
They're hardly that different. You can read specs all you want, but it does't prove that it won't perform as well as the PS4.
-
Err. Ok.
-
Ps3 had better tech too but it was too hard for developers to port over. Same thing will happen next generation since windows and ddr3 ram are tools developers are very familiar with. I dont understand why the PS4 keeps making that mistake they wow with tech but developers dont utilize it
-
My sides are in orbit.
-
None of that will matter if PS4 does not have server lists. Does it?
-
Er. Pleb detected. Server lists are done on a game-by-game basis. The developer decides whether to have them or not.
-
Moron detected. Exactly, the games that don't have server lists are going to severely suffer in multiplayer because of it, therefore already proving the Xbox One is superior.
-
But...the presence of 'server lists' has nothing to do with the console. It is exclusively to do with the individual game. I don't see what is hard to understand about this. Holy shet, even I wasn't this stupid at 12.
-
You haven't heard Microsoft has purchased 300,000 servers? Wow, this was mentioned days ago.
-
Edited by AAAAAA: 5/26/2013 4:22:29 PMYes, that doesn't have any bearing on whether a game has server lists or not. my sides
-
But they are going to.
