This thread is inspired by another: view original post
[url=http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/feb/18/jennifer-mills-westley-murder-trial]Sauce[/url]
I mean we have identical cases here. Instead it's a christian man, cutting off a person's head in the name of Jesus. Except we arrested him, instead of shooting him dead like we do most to most Radical Muslims. He's the definition of Radical Christian and we write him off as "mentally ill". Why don't we give Radical Muslims due process anymore? Have we gotten so used to calling them terrorists that they're automatically a threat with a political agenda the moment they scream ALLAHU AKBAR (God is great), deemed "enemy combatants" and we now can just deny them all their rights?
-
2 Replies in this Sub-ThreadHow were the two Muslims treated differently? - Der
-
... They were shot at by armed police.
-
Edited by Der Todesengel: 5/23/2013 4:50:02 PMFor good reason I assume. If the other guy had been presenting a threat, they should have shot his ass too. However, as the story details, the guy was subdued by a bystander. Not comparable in the least. - Der
-
-