{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
Edited by Chaz:
5/17/2013 6:54:29 PM
7
I know which one I'd rather be.
Scientists that is. They're the ones that actually give the engineers something to work with.
English
-
What about the equipment engineers give to scientists to conduct their studies?
-
Edited by Chaz: 5/18/2013 7:40:55 AMWouldn't exist without science. The entire basis of engineering is the field of physics basically.
-
That last statement alone basically ruins your credibility.
-
Why? Try doing an engineering course without learning physics.
-
It's a lot more than physics, and even then the importance of physics caries for each field. A biomedical and chemical engineer will have physics at the bottom of the priority list. Mechanical engineers use physics the most and you need to delve into chemistry quite a bit.
-
he didnt say there is no physics involved. But you cant say engineering is basically physics. Engineering involves physics, chemistry, maths, financing, economics, language.
-
I suppose I am thinking of it from a pretty basic, functional level. I still think it's fair to say that physics is a pretty big part of it in the way that it lets you understand how a physical system will behave when making one.
