{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
3/27/2013 8:20:10 AM
11
If it's for stricter regulations, I'm for it.
If it's for banning, I'm against it.
English
-
why not enforcing the laws that are already in place? there are hundreds of gun laws that are already made that are not used
-
And most of those gun laws, if not all, are being enforced in California. So far, there hasn't been a massive massacre since the zoot suit riots in this state. There are people dying by guns, I can agree with that, but most likely than not, the people killing with guns probably got them illegally. The cartel is literally a train's trip away from California, so we can't really register all of the guns that come in to the US.
-
and cartels control to drug trade, so stop buying weed, stop funding them, then they leave and less gang violence happens. but thats easier said than done
-
You know the many times people have been trying to legalize weed? If only people weren't so close-minded in America.
-
Where do you think stricter regulations will lead to?
-
Emphasized mental checks.
-
Creeping fascism. Once the state gets that power they aren't gonna just be content with it. They're gonna want more. All of these proposed federal regulations are a slippery slope.
-
California.
-
What?
-
'Creeping fascism' sounds like that creeping sharia nonsense the BNP has been pushing.
-
I totally live in a fascist country, bro :P I can't even cross the road where I wan...oh wait XD
