JavaScript is required to use Bungie.net

Forums

3/11/2013 8:39:37 PM
8
I wonder how the more religious people would take confirmation of this?
English

Posting in language:

 

Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • I'm religious and I would.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • I can't tell if you're trolling or being serious because thats actually a good comment. To be honest in my lifetime I've never asked/brought up life on other plants in my religion.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Not trolling. I really do think about this. I see some rolling with it, and others imploding.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Edited by external: 3/12/2013 4:24:11 AM
    ^Fact. Well, not sure about the implosion, but rolling with it wouldn't be hipocrisy for many Christians, as example, not even [i]dogmatically[/i]. If any would-be biblical scholars here think otherwise (e_e), I have a wiki entry for you to edit: [all italicized emphasis mine] "Christianity regards the Biblical canon, the Old Testament and New Testament, as the [i]inspired[/i] [emphasis mine] word of God. The traditional view of inspiration is that God worked through human authors so that, what they produced was what God wished to communicate. The Greek word referring to inspiration in 2 Timothy 3:16 is Theopneustos, which literally means "God-breathed".[79] Some believe that divine inspiration makes our present Bibles "inerrant". Others claim inerrancy for the Bible in its original manuscripts, though none of those are extant. Still others maintain that only a particular translation is inerrant, such as the King James Version.[80][81][82] [i]Another view closely related is Biblical infallibility or Limited inerrancy, which affirms that the Bible is free of error as a guide to salvation, but may [/i] [may, ha!] [i]include errors on matters such as history, geography, or science.[/i]" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christianity#Scriptures [i]Checkmate, atheists.[/i]

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • What would that change? My religion believes there is life in other planets. This would only be a confirmation that we are right .

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • I think its interesting. And I am religious. If you are referring to people like the Westboro church, then you should specify, because most religious people are nothing like that. (Well, except the terrorists.)

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • No, religious people in general. This will call for a fundamental rethinking of things. Not disproving god per se, but greatly adjusting what is included.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Honestly, most religious people have already done this rethinking, the conservatives are a minority.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

You are not allowed to view this content.
;
preload icon
preload icon
preload icon