{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
3/6/2013 4:24:03 PM
2
Halo 4 is not a failure. If you say it is then you are being a an ignorant hater.
Just because it has things done in ways that you don't agree with doesn't mean the game failed. Did Reach fail? No, yet everyone now misses it when before it was the most hated thing Halo. Idiots like you make me sick.
I like Halo 4. It's a good game. Maybe not up to level with past titles, but it is nonetheless a good game. I actually liked the campaign, which was vastly superior to Reach's.
English
-
What.... you liked H4 Campaign? I mean that's fine to have that opinion but in my opinion it's perhaps weaker than H2 (which is my least favorite). The H4 Campaign is a great example of the problem that plagues H4; lack of variety.
-
Variety? What do you mean exactly? That the game was centered around killing everything to press a switch? Yeah sure, but all Halo games have been centered around killing things to advance. The AI was good and set a good challenge for me on Legendary and I really liked the level design and the art. It all felt fresh and unique. I mean, maybe the story itself wasn't the best, especially the ending with the Didact ordeal but I can overlook those type of stumbles and look at the big picture. A couple of wrong things don't ruin the game as a whole. Something people need to understand with Mass Effect 3. Just because the last 10min of a game is horrible (in their opinion) doesn't mean the WHOLE trilogy/franchise has gone to garbage.
