Modern day game with Desmond?
You mean Deadmond?
I want early 20th century Russia or French Revolution, but then again I probably won't buy it. I suspect it's going to take what AC3 did even further.
English
-
Someones mad about desmonds ending? I was too. They should make a game set in the french revolution. But wouldnt connor be there since he was still alive and in his prime during that time? It might work. Its a chance to make connor likable and less boring and make him mature. Same way brotherhood and revelations did for ezio.
-
I didn't care about Desmond's ending. It was alright. I'm talking about [i]every other aspect of the game.[/i]
-
What?! Desmonds ending felt like my face was being crapped on. Revelations had a beautiful and amazing god tier ending. The way they wrapped up ezio and altairs stories as well as the dialogue was great. And then the final message delivered to guide desmond to stop the apocalypse. It got everyone excited to finish desmonds story. I thought desmond would have a great ending. But no it was ridiculous. The only problem I had with other aspects were that there were far too little buildings to parkour on but sometimes Id forget since the frontier was epic in winter. The glitches were there but didnt affect me much. Connor to me wasnt boring he was an alright character and I understood why he was the way he was. Haytham was a badass so I loved the first parts of the game. Ship combat was amazing and breathtaking. Homestead and side missions were great and unlike revelations I had a lot to do after the main story.
-
Eh, the entire game up to that point had just numbed me and depressed me so much that I didn't even care what happened at the end.
-
What did you think of revelations? I think next to assassins creed 2 and 1 it has the best story but it was kind of like a roller coaster. At times such as the first sequence and sequence 6,7 and 8 its amazing and fun and keeps you on the edge of your seat. But other times such as sequence 2 and 3 it was sort of boring and unrelated to ezio's quest. Every altair memory was great and interesting but I wish half of the game was about him and half for ezio and ezio had to travel to different cities to find the keys not just one. I also didnt like the fact that ezio was so popular and easily made friends in constantinople. I wish he was like this mysterious traveler/outlaw who nobody really knows. People there have heard his name before but they think hes just a legend. I felt he had too many allies and spent too much time with them. All in all it was great to me.
-
Better than Brotherhood for sure. I don't remember much about it other than how much they wanted me to start using their bombs. Ezio's Robes awere the stylinest in that one as was the Armor of Ishak Pasha. Not as many diversions as Brotherhood which was good, but overall it wasn't a real improvement on Brotherhood so much as it was just toning down the things that made Brotherhood annoying.
-
It was better than brotherhood with story. But brotherhood had better gameplay though. Bhood didnt force bombs or anything of the sort on you. Roma>>>>>>Constantinople. Plus Bhood had alot of stuff to do after the main story. Rev when you were finished there was only 2 things to do on the map and then thats it. Rev had way better story. Bhood had way better gameplay.
-
I'm going to pretend you were implying that he's dead to you as a character since otherwise that would have been a complete spoiler (something we have tags for) and a total dick move
-
Of course that's what I meant. Who would spoil a game months old?
-
only a total dick of course, any considerate person would know that the usual spoiler limit is about a year especially considering all the triple A games that are out and the limited amount of time and money that people have. An even more considerate person would put any spoiler in spoiler tags because there are some people that haven't gotten to every franchise and just might be beginning AC now
-
Edited by U124926: 2/11/2013 7:13:57 PM[i]Totally.[/i]