Except the latter has a lot of evidence and scientific explanations to back it up. But I'm going to assume you're one of those pseudo scientists who likes to dismiss the theories he doesn't agree with.

Oh yeah, you know me so well. Not once in my entire life have I been presented with a form of "evidence" for creationism that hasn't come from a biased source. That's a red flag for any rational individual. The only "evidence" creationism has ever been grounded on was poorly understood realms of evolutionary biology, either that, or just flat-out misconstrued and false data. There's a reason "creation science" is dismissed by the scientific community; Because it's complete nonsense. [quote]The scientific consensus, supported by a 2006 statement by 68 national and international science academies, is that it is evidence-based fact derived from observations and experiments in multiple scientific disciplines that the universe has existed for around 13.7 billion years and that the Earth was formed about 4.5 billion years ago, with life first appearing at least 2.5 billion years ago. Although many young Earth creationists (YECs) are active in the development of creation science, an endeavor that holds that the events associated with supernatural creation can be evidenced and modeled through an interpretation of the scientific method, the consensus among scientists is that creation science is unscientific in both conception and methodology.[/quote]

When I said latter, I was referring to ancient aliens. I probably should have been more clear.

Oh shit, dude, sorry. Well, I don't see much evidence for that, either, to be honest. [url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j9w-i5oZqaQ]Watch this and follow the links in the description:[/url]