{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
2/1/2013 9:19:23 PM
6
And that's just it: All the system does is subsidize care for poor people with the money of the rich. So when people say "the system works better", they actually just mean that they like taking from the successful.
English
-
What's the alternative - taking from the poor?
-
The alternative is people getting what they pay for.
-
"Everyone for themselves" doesn't work.
-
The alternative is taking nothing at all.
-
Which leaves us with no revenue. That means no military, no welfare programs, nothing.
-
we dont have to tax the rich to reach a sturdy revenue. how about we have less poor, and just have a solid affordable tax? and by less poor i mean all the fat asses too lazy to work so they just draw welfare checks. i can guarantee if we reduce the over easy access to welfare, and make it to where only the people who really NEED it get it, all this mess would get cleared up. and lots of the gvot spending on welfare would get reduce. leaving us better. less useless spending
