{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
2/1/2013 3:41:36 AM
6
Don't pretend to be objective about it when you only present one side of the argument.
Also, the "statistic" that there has never been a death due to marijuana is misleading. Though it might be virtually impossible to overdose on marijuana, there are quite a few traffic fatalities as a result of marijuana every year.
English
-
3 legged I can ask for opinions without making a 100 percent objective OP people will still speak their mind regardless. I already know I'm on the right side of the argument scientifically which is all i need. I just feel the need to understand why people ignore plain data and continue to assign negative stigma to something that does less damage than two commonly used LEGAL substances.
-
How many alcohol traffic fatalities, and alcohol overdoses have there been?
-
The result of marijuana? No, it's the result of irresponsibility. Substitute alcohol instead of marijuana in any of the scenarios and it would be infinitely worse.
-
2/3 of all crashes involving marijuana there is also alcohol present. And there isn't a lot of marijuana crashes either. More people who aren't high and just suck at driving crash all the time too. I don't see that as an issue.
-
I'm not saying it's substantial. I'm just saying that "THERE HAVE BEEN ABSOLUTELY ZERO DEATHS AS A RESULT OF MARIJUANA" is an inaccurate statement.
-
the reason i said "Directly."
