{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
1/31/2013 11:14:48 PM
7
Example: nearly none of Bush's EO's have stayed in effect. While the economy fell to pieces under his watch, nearly nothing Bush did was permanent. Obama's term will end and things will change. Neither was a king capable of forever ruining the USA.
English
-
The economy under bush was better than it was under clinton.
-
Economic Expansion vs. the Great Recession. This ranks up in the top ten dumbest things I've read.
-
ARE YOU NUTS? The stock market fell apart after 9/11 and never fully recovered. Then the not com bust killed it the rest of the way. Followed finally by the mortgage crisis? Seriously dude? I don't think Bush was responsible for much of it, but to say it was better under Bush than Clinton...
-
Let me restate what I meant: Bush's policies did more to help the economy and Clinton's policies damaged the economy.
-
That is very much up for interpretations. I would argue that the Republican Congress passing laws that a Democratic White House enforced was better for the economy than a Republican House and White House. I think both sides have shown rather thoroughly they need the other side to balance them.
-
Edited by DMMetalaane: 2/1/2013 12:36:26 AM
-
Do you have any proof of this?
